생산관리 Toyota Motor Manufacturing USA, Inc (도요타 미국 현지공장 사례)
[생산관리] Toyota Motor Manufacturing USA, Inc (도요타 미국 현지공장
사례).docx |
|
목차 목 차 Q2. Where, if at all, does the current routine for
handling defective seats deviate from the principles of the Toyota Production
System? Q1. As Doug Friesen, what would you do to address the seat problem?
Where would you focus your attention and solution efforts? What options exist?
What would be recommended? Why? In order to address the seat problem, we came
up with three creative options: Outsourcing, quality assistant program and
inventory management team.
Q3. What are the causes of recall problems of
Toyota in 2010-2011? What would be recommended?
본문 Hiring
suppliers other than KFS will solve the overload problem. With more outsourcing
companies Toyota would be able to produce higher quality products with less
defects. First, seat colors are not the key point when people purchase cars. So
Toyota doesnt need to focus on the seat colors as much. With the TMC marketing
team, TMM will have to reduce the number of seat colors in order of popularity.
Current variety of seat colors lowers efficiency. For example, if the company
decreases the number of colors from 15 to 7~8, they can hire 3-4 companies for
seat production. This way, each supplier will be in charge of only 1-2 types of
seats, minimizing errors. They only have to make certain portion of seats so
they less burden.If we hire too many outsourcing companies, the cost may
increase but the benefits of outsourcing still outweighs the costs.
If
Toyota has too many outsourcing companies there may be a lack of uniformity in
product quality. We are also going to improve the quality by sending quality
assistants to every subcontractor. For the subcontractors, the most important
factors are profit maximization and cost reduction, which sacrifice the product
quality. This problem can be solved with our quality assistants who force all
the subcontractors to meet TMM’s strict quality standards. The assistants also
have the right to reject the products that do not meet the criteria. It will
guarantee high-quality.
There is an example of QA in Korea. GS shop
adopted this system. Before selling products, their quality assistant goes to
the vendor and examines their product quality according to GS standards. If the
quality does not meet the standard, the vendor has to improve the product until
they get approval. GS shop thinks the QA system is their main source of
competitiveness.
본문내용 fective seats deviate from the
principles of the Toyota Production System? KFS was the only supplier of
seats. They not only produced seats, but they also handled defective seats by
delivering replacements whenever needed. Under such routine, however, it was
difficult for KFS to focus on jidoka, the main principle of TPS, due to product
proliferation and mass production Q1. As Doug Friesen, what
|
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기